Lance Armstrong attack on Mt. Ventoux 2000 Tour de France
23 aprile 2010 09:49Lance Armstrong attacks on the top of Mt. Ventoux to catch Marco Pantini during the 2000 Tour de France
 |
 BORRACCE CASTELLO CALCIO CICLISMO CORSA ZEUS EUR 17,90 |
 OCCHIALI SOLE KAYAK SPORT RUNNING CICLISMO EUR 20,99 |
 SELLE DOLOMITI VITTORIO VENETO CICLISMO BICICLETTA EUR 18,00 |
 Scarpe bicicletta bici northwave ciclismo EUR 50,00 |
 Fondello antibatterico di prot in GEL per Ciclismo EUR 9,60 |
 SPORT CICLISMO BICI OSWEGO MILANO 1925 piega ma BELLA EUR 28,00 |
 SPORT CICLISMO MOTO GILERA GRAN PREMIO 1956 BELLA EUR 29,99 |
 SPORT CICLISMO 9° GRAN PREMIO 1958 BELLA EUR 29,99 |
 SPORT CICLISMO CICLI ROYAL FABRIC 1930 BELLA EUR 43,00 |
Pubblicato in Ciclismo | 
Tag: 2000, Armstrong, Cycling, de, France, Lance, lance armstrong, lance armstrong attack on mt ventoux 2000 tour de france, Marco, mt ventoux, Mt., Pantani, team, Tour, tour de france, USPS, Ventoux
lance armstrong is an illuminati LOOOOOL!
lance armstrong= steeve austin
lance armstrong is old fashioned alberto contador is stronger than him ha ha ha ha!
He just looks in so much more excellent condition than pantani. Pantani a few years before this looked in as good of condition as Armstrong. I guess Cocaine is really a hell of a drug.
Umm whats EPO? lmao whatever EPO is it doesnt make me change my mind about Lance being a fucking BEAST!
A beast that without EPO or blood transfusin was unable to finish TDF in top 30 !
well, what is EPO?!
its a blood booster
wow you’re cool for saying that..
thats right usa usa usa usa usa
Not to be argumentative, but Lance still won the Worlds before cancer, he wasn’t completely unheard of.
@recon455 I agree with you. But ambition can be a surprising thing. We’ll probably never know whether or not Lance doped.
I was only pointing out the fallaciousness of the logic that Lance would never dope because he almost died of cancer. ^.^ I still love cycling, and I hope everyday the sport is clean.
try it on google ??? Very interessting 2 read
Lance never got results before working with Ferrari. As showed the tests done for olympic games in 1996, his body was not build for stage races.
EPO helped him to correct his weakness.
Just have a look at American Scientific of June 1996 .
0:05 to 0:14 makes the hairs on the back of my neck stand up
@pirculator And the Yankees are never going to write crap crap crap and blah blah blah.
cancer also completely changed his body… look at that… Stop ruining videos by posting dumb doping comments… Just enjoy the cycling videos…
@mateo1726 Cancer changed his body during his illness, then he had a similar body and similar weight, even he had more weight. You just have to look a lot of pictures of him to see it. Lance testimony at SCA affairs confirmed it. Only blood doping drugs can make an 25-30% improvement for any elite athlete as we have seen.
@u368 Look at any endurance sport, the athletes peak later…world marathon record- set by a 35 year old. 39 yr old woman won gold in bejing. Do you think all the excess upper body muscle he lost during chemo might have helped too? If you’re going to reference something dont just include the month and year.
@u368 Ulrich was on EPO anyway. Why couldnt he keep up?
@Skipissatan Maybe because he had not the best doctor or the best PED or doping has less effect on his body like sometimes some medicine have no effect for some people despite being good with others.
@Skipissatan In cycling riders peak up earlier and show their abilities around 22 -23.
Merckx, Coppi, Anquetil, Hinault, Lemond, Van Impe, … showed great abilities in their first stage races or ITT, they were all able to climb many passes with the bests !
@u368 nonsense at early ages obviously good riders will still be good but they peak later, sastre won his first tour at 32, Óscar Pereiro his at 27, Pantani at 28, Indurain won his last at 32. Hinault was at his most dominant from his late 20s and was still winning tours at 32. Firmin Lambot won the race aged 37.
@u368 You look at the physique of great stage riders, especially those that can climb and they normally weigh around 60-70kg. When lance was younger he was a triathlete and in his earlier tours he weighed 79kg. These extra kilos can mean a second per km on the hilly stages, and it hampers the rider.
@u368 After cancer he weighed 6-7kgs less and was able to compete. Look at the effect losing 8kg of TT muscle had on Bradley Wiggins last year. He went from strictly a TT specialist to being able to hold is own in the alps- with only really lance, andy schleck and contador able to outclimb him. Wiggins is also the cleanest rider in the sport with his blood tests available online.
From Lance’ s interview 1997 tcrc. acor. org/lance.html !
I had the brain operation there the Thursday prior to my next chemo cycle and then started that the following Monday with 3 more cycles of VIP. The last VIP (chemos) were inpatient…cycles 3 and 4 I was sick as a dog, but I didn’t lose any weight.
@u368
So he didn’t lose any weight over that chemo cycle, not the course of the illness. nice selective quoting there. Weight loss is incredibly common in cancer. In his first book he specifically notes weight loss as a result of cancer. When he won the UCI world championship in 93 he weighed 79kg, in 99 he weighed 75. That is irrefutable.